Patient perspectives of helpful risk management practices within mental health services. A mixed studies systematic review of primary research

Kris Deering, Chris Pawson, Neil Summers, Jo Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction
Minimizing the harm that patients pose to themselves and others, due to mental health difficulties, is a central component of risk management in psychiatry. However, risk management itself can cause patient harm, but despite this and the potentially informative value of lived experience, little is known about what patients want or expect from risk management.

Aim
To review research and explore what patients consider beneficial in risk management practice.

Method
A mixed studies systematic review utilizing PRISMA guidelines, alongside a convergent qualitative design to categorize findings.

Results
Twelve papers were identified, generating two categories of beneficial practices: interpersonal relationships and communication with clinicians; coupled with patient agency in their own risk management.

Discussion
Connectivity appears important. Particularly patients feeling involved, and their voices being heard in both the identification of risks and then shaping risk management practice. Moreover, this included involvement of friends, family and peers to widen input and supportive networks beyond clinical relationships.

Implications for Practice
Risk management needs to be an accessible part of care, which is more inclusive of patient views and needs. The latter might also be aided by drawing on the patient's wider community in order to provide more effective support and risk management.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-197
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Volume26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient perspectives of helpful risk management practices within mental health services. A mixed studies systematic review of primary research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this