Needle-free intradermal vaccination, an opportunity to improve commercial pig welfare

Issy Lewis, Harriet Wishart, Ellie Breeze, Poppy Setter, Jonathan Amory

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In-farm livestock production vaccinations are commonly delivered intramuscularly using needles. While there are alternative strategies these have been subject to little attention and limited commercialisation. One such alternative is needle-free vaccines and studies have focused on the immune response few have addressed the welfare implications. This study aims to compare the impact of intradermal needle-free vaccination and intramuscular injection in terms of the welfare of the piglets. A total of 179 piglets were divided into two treatments: intradermal needle-free delivery and intramuscular delivery of a vaccine. Measures of health and welfare included, vocalisations, behavioural observations, papule formation, and weight. Piglets vaccinated via the needle-free intradermal route vocalised less and displayed no significant behavioural differences but showed increased weight compared to piglets vaccinated intramuscularly. The use of a needle-free device to deliver a vaccine through an intradermal route revealed no adverse effects on piglet welfare and supports the use of alternative strategies to vaccinate livestock.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAnimal Welfare
Volume33
Early online date4 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Nov 2024

Keywords

  • animal welfare
  • behaviour
  • needle-free vaccination
  • pain
  • piglets
  • vocalisations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Needle-free intradermal vaccination, an opportunity to improve commercial pig welfare'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this