Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review

Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo, Cristian Álvarez, Antonio García-Hermoso, Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, Paulo Gentil, Abbas Asadi, Helmi Chaabene, Jason Moran, César Meylan, Antonio Garcia de Alcaraz, Javier Sánchez, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Urs Granacher, William Kraemer, Mikel Izquierdo

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

115 Citations (Scopus)
303 Downloads (Pure)


Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to i) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols), and ii) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to: an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths and individual sports (~24.0%, ~37.0% and ~12.0% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~34.0% and ~55.0% of overall studies, respectively); studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~40.0% and ~20.0% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants' daily training routines (~47.0% and ~39.0% of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training are needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long-term.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1059-1081
Number of pages22
JournalSports Medicine
Issue number5
Early online date22 Feb 2018
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this