Everyday scientific literacy: Do students use information about the social context and methods of research to evaluate news briefs about science?

Corinne Zimmerman, Gay L. Bisanz, Jeffrey Bisanz

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Skill in evaluating media reports about science is an important aspect of scientific literacy for citizens in the 21st century. To identify the kinds of information individuals used to evaluate media reports about science, university students were asked to judge the credibility of specially constructed news briefs and to justify their judgments. Credibility ratings were influenced by the area of research, the plausibility of the conclusions, and information about the quality of research methods. Information related to the social context of the research had no effect, despite its importance for evaluating conclusions reported in news briefs. Students used a variety of criteria for justifying their judgments, including the information provided in the reports, prior knowledge, and prior belief. Implications for defining and assessing scientific literacy are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-207
Number of pages20
JournalAlberta Journal of Educational Research
Volume44
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Everyday scientific literacy: Do students use information about the social context and methods of research to evaluate news briefs about science?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this