TY - JOUR
T1 - Chilean public attitudes towards beef production systems
AU - Mansky de la Fuente, Valentina
AU - Enriquez-Hidalgo, Daniel
AU - Lemos Teixeira, Dayane
AU - Larrain, Rafael
AU - Hötzel, Maria Jose
A2 - Souza, Julio Cesar de
PY - 2023/4/26
Y1 - 2023/4/26
N2 - Much is discussed about the characteristics, efficiency, and externalities of indoor housing and pasture-based beef production systems, but little is known about how these features influence public attitudes towards beef production. This study aimed to explore Chilean citizens’ attitudes towards beef production systems and their underlying reasons. Citizens (n = 1,084) were recruited to participate in a survey and given information about one beef production system: indoor housing, continuous grazing or regenerative grazing. Participants had more favourable attitudes (from 1 = most negative attitudes to 5 = most positive attitudes) towards pasture-based systems (regenerative grazing = 2.94; continuous grazing = 2.83) than towards indoor housing (1.94), mainly due to concerns with animal welfare and environmental impacts. Productivity was not as important as the other sustainability aspects for participants as they were not willing to do that trade-off. Support for beef production may benefit if production systems adopt characteristics that are perceived by the public as positive for the environment and animal welfare.
AB - Much is discussed about the characteristics, efficiency, and externalities of indoor housing and pasture-based beef production systems, but little is known about how these features influence public attitudes towards beef production. This study aimed to explore Chilean citizens’ attitudes towards beef production systems and their underlying reasons. Citizens (n = 1,084) were recruited to participate in a survey and given information about one beef production system: indoor housing, continuous grazing or regenerative grazing. Participants had more favourable attitudes (from 1 = most negative attitudes to 5 = most positive attitudes) towards pasture-based systems (regenerative grazing = 2.94; continuous grazing = 2.83) than towards indoor housing (1.94), mainly due to concerns with animal welfare and environmental impacts. Productivity was not as important as the other sustainability aspects for participants as they were not willing to do that trade-off. Support for beef production may benefit if production systems adopt characteristics that are perceived by the public as positive for the environment and animal welfare.
KW - Animal Welfare
KW - Animals
KW - Attitude
KW - Cattle
KW - Chile
KW - Conservation of Natural Resources
KW - Public Opinion
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0284080
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0284080
M3 - Journal Article
C2 - 37099484
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 18
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 4
ER -